Understanding The ISO/TS
16949:2002 Standard
8.2.3 Monitoring and Measurement of
Processes
You
shall:
Apply suitable methods
for monitoring, and where applicable, measurement of QMS
processes (see 4.1)
These methods shall
demonstrate the ability of QMS processes to achieve planned
results (see 4.1)
If planned results are
not achieved, take correction and corrective action to ensure
product conformity
8.2.3.1 Monitoring and
Measurement of Manufacturing
Processes
Perform
process studies of
all new manufacturing (including assembly and sequencing)
processes) to verify process capability & to provide
additional input for process
control
Document
the results of
process studies with specifications (where applicable) for
production, measurement, test & maintenance
instructions
These documents
shall include objectives for manufacturing process capability,
reliability, maintainability & availability, as well as
acceptance criteria
Maintain
manufacturing process capability or performance as specified by
the customer part approval
requirements
Implement Control
Plans & process flow diagram to ensure conformity to
specified:
Þ
Measurement techniques,
Þ
Sampling plans,
Þ
Acceptance criteria and
Þ
Reaction plans when criteria not
met
Keep a record of
significant process events such as tool change, machine repair,
etc.
Initiate reaction
plans from the Control Plan, for characteristics that are
either unstable or not statistically
capable.
These reaction
plans shall include containment of product and 100% inspection,
as appropriate
Then complete a
corrective action plan indicating timing and assigned
responsibilities to assure that the process becomes stable and
capable. If required, review these plans with the customer and
get their approval.
Keep records of
effective dates of process changes
Key Explanation Points and
Tips:
Þ
You must establish methods and indicators to monitor and
measure your QMS processes (see clause 4.1e and 5.4.1) to
demonstrate process capability to achieve planned results and
identify opportunities to improve the process. Use your
organizations cross-functional knowledge of customer
requirements; product; technology; manufacturing processes;
etc, to determine process monitoring and measuring indicators
and controls. Monitoring and measurement may be done manually
or by automated means.
Þ
One way to identify useful measuring and monitoring
methods is to review what problems could occur or have
occurred within a particular process. Monitor and measure these
occurrences and develop process controls (methods) to reduce or
eliminate them. Problems (risks) can occur with any of the
variables in a process – e.g. – materials; equipment; facility;
methods; technology; personnel; computer hardware or software;
etc. By using fishbone analysis or similar tools, you can
develop very useful monitoring and measuring methods and
process performance indicators.
Þ
Correction
refers to action taken to eliminate a detected nonconformity
(see clause 8.3). Correction involves the containment,
evaluation of the nonconformity and action that may result in
rework; regrade; scrap; return of nonconforming material/work
to supplier or outsourcer; or acceptance through a customer
concession or deviation permit.
Þ
Correction differs from corrective action (clause 8.5.2).
Corrective action is action
taken to eliminate the cause of a detected nonconformity
to prevent recurrence; whereas correction does not
address cause.
Þ
You must monitor your manufacturing QMS processes, first to
determine and establish capability of new processes to conform
to requirements
Þ
And secondly, to monitor these processes over time to verify
ongoing stability and capability to meet
requirements
Þ
And thirdly to determine and achieve levels of continual
improvement
Þ
Use your APQP, FMEA, MSA and PPAP reference manuals for
guidance in determining process monitoring and measuring
indicators and controls.
Also review specific measurement and monitoring requirements at
OEM customer or IATF websites.
Þ
The output of your manufacturing process design process (clause
7.3.3.2 and 7.3.2.2) must specify the
manufacturing process capability, reliability, maintainability
& availability indicators, as well as process approval
acceptance criteria
Þ
Your manufacturing process capability performance must conform
to the capability documented in your PPAP submission or agreed
with your customer in writing. You must keep records of this
ongoing conformance to your customer requirements and use this
information to identify opportunities to improve the process.
Þ
The measurement techniques, sampling plans, acceptance criteria
and reaction plans must be documented or referenced in your control
plan. Managers responsible for corrective action must be
promptly informed of product and process nonconformities (see
clause 5.5.1.1).
Also review specific sampling plan requirements at OEM customer
or IATF websites.
Þ
Where the customer is significantly affected by a process
nonconformity or change, they must be notified. Corrective action plans as well
as resulting updated/changed PPAP’s must be reviewed and
approved by the customer, when so required. If in doubt, get
clarification from the customer.
Þ
Use your manufacturing design process (clause 7.3) and change
control process (clause 7.1.4) to manage manufacturing process
changes.
Þ
Performance indicators are not needed for this clause as it
provides direction for the application of monitoring and
measurement performance indicators for all QMS processes.
However the output of monitoring and measurement methods used
within each QMS process provides useful performance indicators
for determining the effective implementation and maintenance of
QMS processes. Review the performance indicators within each
process covered this far.
Þ
Performance indicators to measure process effectiveness and
efficiency include -
productivity; reduction of cycle time, waste, errors, omissions
and failures; asset utilization rates (downtime, turnover),
etc.
Þ
Don’t overlook performance indicators to measure compliance
with process related regulatory requirements – e.g., reduction
in health and safety incident/violation rates; reduction in
regulatory reporting violations, etc.
|