ISO 9001 Lead Auditor
Training
Module 7 - Audit
Reporting
7.3.4 Auditor post-audit
actions The auditing company needs a system
for follow-up to monitor the auditee's progress. More external
systems lose their credibility due to lack of an effective
follow-up system than for any other reason.
ISO 9001 Auditor Training - There are
certain situations where there would be no follow up. If the
audit was by a second party to establish a degree of conformity
with the Standard and found many major failures (and no
likelihood of business), then there would be no follow-up
requirement by the auditor. Another example would be if the
audit was by a third party for the purpose of registration and
the auditee decided not to proceed. More commonly, the
nonconformities are followed up by the auditor to
satisfactorily “close out” the audit.
When a follow-up visit is made, it is
only the nonconformities that were identified that are
re-audited. If this were not the case, the process would never
end and would not be logical. Often, the follow-up may be done
without a visit.
For a small number of minor
nonconformities found during an internal audit, the follow-up
may be left until the next planned audit within that area, if
practical.
ISO 9001 Auditor Training - For second
party audits (and especially third party audits), a written
response to minor nonconformities is required. Based on an
acceptable response, the nonconformities would be reviewed and
closed out during the next surveillance visit.
For some of the nonconformities that
were purely documentary in nature, it might be possible to deal
with them by only a written response.
When a visit is necessary, for example,
to follow up on a major nonconformity, it may not be the team
leader, or even a team member, but another suitably qualified
person located near the auditee company that performs the
audit. If the auditor is to use the nonconformity statements to
follow up on the corrective action, then the nonconformity
statements must be very specific and traceable. A summary of
the follow-up process is:
1. Identification of
nonconformities
2. Summary report prepared
3. Corrective action request (CAR) issued
4. Auditor evaluates response to CAR
5. Completion of corrective action by auditee
6. Evaluation of effectiveness by auditee
7. Verification of completion by auditor
8. Escalation (if necessary)
9. Records of each stage in this process
Audit reports need to be read by
various people in the company, so a distribution list can be
helpful, especially where confidentiality is a major
concern.
Within the system for third party
registration, the audit is not the end of the story. Following
the granting of a certificate (which attests to the conformity
of the system to the Standard at the time of the audit), the
third party carries out some form of regular surveillance by
visiting the company at periodic intervals and checking that
the system continues to operate effectively in terms of
realizing planned activities and achieving planned results.
After a number of these continuous assessment visits, a
complete re-audit or review of previous results is carried out,
depending on the policy of the Registrar. During the
surveillance period (typically 2 3 years), the visits
themselves (every 6-12 months) would normally cover the
complete quality management system.
7.3.5 Corrective Action and Preventive
Action The auditor's responsibility is to
make clear to the auditee that corrective action is necessary.
The auditor rarely specifies corrective action (that is the
auditee's duty). Since the auditee is likely to propose
corrective action, the auditor must have a view about how
effective, or otherwise, such an action might be in resolving
the situation once and for all.
Once a nonconformity is in the system,
the auditee must ensure that effective and appropriate
corrective action has been taken. After clarifying with the
auditor for a clear understanding of the nonconformity, and
certainly with people in the area where the nonconformity was
found, the best corrective action can be decided.
ISO 9000 Lead
Auditor Training - The process of taking, checking, and
monitoring the action should be formal it is
perhaps the most important “Quality” activity that takes place
in a company. It is certainly where the audit system takes a
positive aspect rather than a negative one. However, the
process of corrective action is not an easy one.
The auditee has to get to the root
cause of the problem if it is going to be corrected forever. It
is very easy to correct the effect of the nonconformance
instead of the root cause, so in time the nonconformity will
re-appear. The auditee also will have to consider the impact of
the corrective action on the rest of the process, as well as,
the effect it might have on areas not considered during the
audit.
The essential features of corrective
action are as follows:
1. Identification of
nonconformity
2. Establish responsibility for controlling the pertinent
process
3. Collect data to establish root cause for the
nonconformity
4. Analyze the data and establish corrective action
5. Monitor effectiveness of this action, including
internal auditing
6. Revise the action if ineffective
7. Record all the actions taken
8. Amend system documentation, as necessary
All corrective action is not
necessarily so involved. Some of the stages listed above are
completed rather easily. However, all corrective action follows
this general path.
ISO 9000
Training - The forward-looking company will determine some
criteria for success. If the company is going to be involved in
these activities, the business should improve after the audits
and the corrective(s) have been taken. Has the error rate
reduced? Do we now respond to our customer needs quicker? Have
we reduced the number of bad debts? Are we throwing out less
waste every night, etc?
Sources of preventive actions may arise from analysis of data
and from lessons learned from corrective actions that may be
applied to potential similar situations. Once identified, the
process for addressing preventive actions may be similar to
corrective action.
If you are interested in
taking formal accredited ISO
9001 Lead Auditor training, call me at 905-593-8867 or email
me at artjlewis@rogers
to get details of the scheduled
dates, locations and cost for the best recognized
training course providers. Another option would be to
contact some
of the training providers listed on this page
and see if they offer the accredited ISO 9000 lead
auditor course at a time and place you
prefer.
Related ISO Lead Auditor
Training
Resources:
"Understanding ISO
9001" provides a detailed
explanation of each ISO 9001 clause
(requirements).
ISO 9001
FAQ provides answers to commonly
asked questions about the ISO 9000 family of quality management
standards.
|